The gaps in law around MAiD are glaring from

MAiD: Evolving Laws, Unresolved Ethical Concerns

Introduction

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) has sparked widespread debate, with legal frameworks evolving to accommodate this complex issue. However, gaps in the law remain, leaving ethical concerns unresolved.

Legal Framework of MAiD

In 2016, Canada legalized MAiD under specific criteria. Critically ill patients with "a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability" and "enduring and intolerable suffering" can request MAiD. Patients must be capable of making decisions and provide informed consent.

Unresolved Ethical Concerns

Despite the legal framework, ethical concerns persist. One issue is the potential for abuse or coercion, especially among vulnerable individuals. The definition of "enduring and intolerable suffering" is subjective, and it is difficult to ensure that it is applied consistently.

Another concern is the impact of MAiD on family and society. Some argue that it devalues life or promotes a culture of disposability. Others contend that it allows individuals to have control over the end of their lives and alleviate suffering.

Gaps in the Law

The MAiD framework has several gaps. For example, it does not address MAiD for minors, those with mental illness, or non-residents of the country. The criteria for MAiD are also open to interpretation, leading to inconsistencies in its application.

Conclusion

The legal framework of MAiD continues to evolve, but gaps remain that leave ethical concerns unresolved. Ensuring that MAiD is provided ethically and fairly requires ongoing discussion and refinement of the law, as well as a thoughtful consideration of its ethical implications.